Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaddou, Mehdi-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-28T05:27:22Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-28T05:27:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBaddou, Mehdi. (2016). Islamic banks versus ethical banks: stability and efficiency (Master dissertation). INCEIF, Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved from https://ikr.inceif.org/handle/INCEIF/2642en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ikr.inceif.org/handle/INCEIF/2642-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we shed light on a specific business model of Conventional Banks adopted by Ethical Banks (also called social, sustainable, alternative banks). We believe that this model shares many similarities with the substance of Islamic Finance when it comes to financing the economy. In our study, we used univariate comparisons between Islamic and Ethical Banks to compare efficiency, profitability, capitalization, volatility and stability from 1992 to 2014. Our results show that Islamic Banks were more efficient, more profitable, and better capitalized than Ethical Banks for most of the period ... Kindly email to kmc@inceif.org to access the item.en_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherINCEIFen_US
dc.rights2016. INCEIF-
dc.sourceGS-
dc.subjectIslamic bankingen_US
dc.subjectEthical bankingen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.titleIslamic banks versus ethical banks: stability and efficiencyen_US
dc.typeMasteren_US
ikr.topic.maintopicIslamic bankingen_US
ikr.doctypeTheses-
dc.contributor.supervisorAbdul Hamid, Baharom-
Appears in Collections:Master


There are no files associated with this item.
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaddou, Mehdi-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-28T05:27:22Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-28T05:27:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBaddou, Mehdi. (2016). Islamic banks versus ethical banks: stability and efficiency (Master dissertation). INCEIF, Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved from https://ikr.inceif.org/handle/INCEIF/2642en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ikr.inceif.org/handle/INCEIF/2642-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we shed light on a specific business model of Conventional Banks adopted by Ethical Banks (also called social, sustainable, alternative banks). We believe that this model shares many similarities with the substance of Islamic Finance when it comes to financing the economy. In our study, we used univariate comparisons between Islamic and Ethical Banks to compare efficiency, profitability, capitalization, volatility and stability from 1992 to 2014. Our results show that Islamic Banks were more efficient, more profitable, and better capitalized than Ethical Banks for most of the period ... Kindly email to kmc@inceif.org to access the item.en_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherINCEIFen_US
dc.rights2016. INCEIF-
dc.sourceGS-
dc.subjectIslamic bankingen_US
dc.subjectEthical bankingen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.titleIslamic banks versus ethical banks: stability and efficiencyen_US
dc.typeMasteren_US
ikr.topic.maintopicIslamic bankingen_US
ikr.doctypeTheses-
dc.contributor.supervisorAbdul Hamid, Baharom-
Appears in Collections:Master


There are no files associated with this item.